Pesquisas qualitativas que contribuem para o controle da administração pública
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52028/Palavras-chave:
Controle, Administração pública, Pesquisas qualitativasResumo
O objetivo desta pesquisa é descrever estudos qualitativos em publicações de alto impacto que contribuem para o controle na administração pública. Para isso, é realizada uma contextualização das revistas, seguida pela apresentação das contribuições das pesquisas por meio do agrupamento dos artigos e análise das metodologias adotadas. A metodologia é descritiva, baseada na análise de artigos publicados entre 2017 e 2022, com um H-Index médio de 73. Os artigos são agrupados de acordo com suas áreas de contribuição. Observa-se um maior número de estudos aplicados, exploratórios e transversais, com poucas mudanças significativas nos procedimentos de pesquisa. Destaca-se a importância da triangulação com dados governamentais. Este trabalho visa analisar pesquisas qualitativas de alto impacto no campo do controle na administração pública, com o objetivo de contribuir para o avanço do controle nesse contexto, enfatizando suas contribuições científicas e metodologias.
Referências
ALSHAHRANI, Albandari; DENNEHY, Denis; MÄNTYMÄKI, Matti. An attention-based view of AI assimilation in public sector organizations: the case of Saudi Arabia. Government Information
Quarterly, v. 39, n. 4, p. 101617, Oct. 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101617
ALSHOUBAKI, Wa’ed; HARRIS, Michael. Striving for Protection: Whistleblowers in Jordan. Sage Open, v. 12, n. 2, abr. 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21582440221095023.
ATRICON. Programa Nacional de Transparência Pública, 2023. Disponível em: https://atricon.org.br/136944-2/. Acesso em: 1 jun. 2023.
BENSON, Sandy; BURTON, Eric James. The Daunting Role of the Audit Committee: 21 actions to take before serving or while serving on an audit committee. Journal Of Corporate Accounting & Finance, v. 29, n. 2, p. 57-73, abr. 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22326.
BOGUE, Russell C. Democratic Privacy. Journal Of Applied Philosophy, p. 1-23, 31 Oct. 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/japp.12632.
CRESSEY, D. R. Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press, 1953.
DíAZ, Javier Miranzo; MARTINEZ, Agustí Cerrillo I; CALDÉS, Ramon Galindo; CARRANZA, Judith Castro. Corruption risk analysis in local public procurement: a look at the àrea metropolitana de Barcelona. International Review Of Administrative Sciences, 1 Nov 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00208523221126860.
ERIKSEN, Erik O. Three modes of administrative behaviour: differentiated policy implementation and the problem of legal certainty. Journal Of European Public Policy, p. 1-20, 18 Oct. 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2125047.
ERLICH, Aaron; BERLINER, Daniel; PALMER-RUBIN, Brian; BAGOZZI, Benjamin E. Media Attention and Bureaucratic Responsiveness. Journal Of Public Administration Research And Theory, v. 31, n. 4, p. 687-703, 5 Febr. 2021. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab001. FERRY, Laurence; RADCLIFFE, Vaughan S.; STECCOLINI, Ileana. The future of public audit.
Financial Accountability & Management, v. 38, n. 3, p. 325-336, 11 Jul. 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faam.12339.
FREY, Erin; BERNSTEIN, Ethan; REKENTHALER, Nick. Scarlet Letters: rehabilitation through transgression transparency and personal narrative control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9 Aug. 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00018392221115154.
GEKOSKI, Anna; ADLER, Joanna R; MCSWEENEY, Tim. Profiling the Fraudster: findings from a rapid evidence assessment. Global Crime, v. 23, n. 4, p. 422-442, 2 Oct. 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2022.2137670.
HARTLEY, Jean; PARKER, Steven; BEASHEL, Jim. Leading and recognizing public value. Public Administration, v. 97, n. 2, p. 264-278, 7 Febr. 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/padm.12563
JENSEN, Michael C.; MECKLING, William H. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal Of Financial Economics, v. 3, n. 4, p. 305-360, Oct. 1976. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x.
JÖNSSON, Elin. Struggles for Regulatory Hardening: exploring swedish politics on corporate social responsibility. The British Journal Of Criminology, p. 1-15, 5 Nov. 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac082.
MADISON, J. The Federalist No. 51: The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments. In: HAMILTON, A.; MADISON, J.; JAY, J. (ed.). The Federalist Papers. New York: Bantam Dell, 1787.
MASTERS, Marick F.; GOEDDEKE, Frank; GIBNEY, Ray; VOLZ, William. Balancing Rights and Responsibilities in Remedying Union Corruption: the case of the United Auto Workers (UAW). Employee Responsibilities And Rights Journal, v. 34, n. 4, p. 385-411, 30 Sept. 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10672-022-09423-4.
MAULIDI, Ach; ANSELL, Jake. Tackling practical issues in fraud control: a practice-based study. Journal Of Financial Crime, v. 28, n. 2, p. 493-512, 26 Oct. 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jfc-07-2020-0150.
MENDEZ, Carlos; PEGAN, Andreja; TRIGA, Vasiliki. Creating public value in regional policy. Bringing citizens back in. Public Management Review, p. 1-25, 17 Oct. 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2126880.
MONTESQUIEU, C. de S. O espírito das leis. São Paulo: Martin Claret, 2001.
NAUMOVSKA, Ivana; LAVIE, Dovev. When an Industry Peer Is Accused of Financial Misconduct: stigma versus competition effects on non-accused firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 66, n. 4, p. 1130-1172, 2 Jun. 2021. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00018392211020662.
NISKANEN, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Aldine Transaction.
OELRICH, Sebastian. Intention without action? Differences between whistleblowing intention and behavior on corruption and fraud. Business Ethics, The Environment & Responsibility, v. 30, n. 3, p. 447-463, 31 Mar. 2021. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/beer.12337.
PAANANEN, Soili; PUUSTINEN, Alisa; RAISIO, Harri; JALONEN, Harri. Embracing dynamic tensions: peacekeeping as a balancing act of complexity. Public Administration Review, v. 82, n. 6, p. 1168-1178, 3 Jul. 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.13535.
PARIMAH, Feikoab; DAVOUR, Makafui Jonas; KWAKYE-NUAKO, Charlotte Omane; KENNETH, Owusu Ansah; ADADE, Abigail; ADIH, Prince. A snapshot of emotional harms caused by the litigation process – Qualitative data from Ghana. Forensic Science International: Mind and Law, v. 2, Nov. 2021. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsiml.2021.100050.
RADDER, Hans. Which Scientific Knowledge is a Common Good? Social Epistemology, v. 31, n. 5, p. 431-450, 18 Aug. 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2017.1353656.
RUSTIARINI, Ni Wayan et al. Why people commit public procurement fraud? The fraud diamond view. Journal Of Public Procurement, United Kingdom, p. 1-18, Oct. 2019.
SALDANHA, Douglas Morgan Fullin; DIAS, Cleidson Nogueira; GUILLAUMON, Siegrid. Transparency and accountability in digital public services: learning from the Brazilian cases. Government Information Quarterly, v. 39, n. 2, Apr. 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101680.t
SANTOS, Karine da Silva et al. O uso de triangulação múltipla como estratégia de validação em um estudo qualitativo. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 25, n. 2, p. 655-664, fev. 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020252.12302018.
SCHNEIDER, Anne L.; INGRAM, Helen M. Social Constructions, Anticipatory Feedback Strategies, and Deceptive Public Policy. Policy Studies Journal, v. 47, n. 2, p. 206-236, 17 Oct. 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psj.12281.
SHEINGATE, Adam. Policy Regime Decay. Policy Studies Journal, v. 50, n. 1, p. 65-89, 28 Dec. 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psj.12420.
TAYLOR, Jeannette. Internal Whistle-Blowing in the Public Service: a matter of trust. Public Administration Review, v. 78, n. 5, p. 717-726, May 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12946
VALENTINE, Melissa A. Renegotiating Spheres of Obligation: the role of hierarchy in organizational learning. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 63, n. 3, p. 570-606, 30 Jun. 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0001839217718547.
WINSVOLD, Marte; ZEINER, Hilde Hatleskog; STOKSTAD, Sigrid. Short- and long-term delegation: what are the effects on politician: sense of control? Public Management Review, p. 1-17, 6 Oct. 2021. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1988271.
YUSUF, Zulkarnain; NAWAWI, Anuar; SALIN, Ahmad Saiful Azlin Puteh. The effectiveness of payroll system in the public sector to prevent fraud. Journal Of Financial Crime, p. 1-16, Jun. 2020.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista do Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Santa Catarina

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






